Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 633 (0.99 seconds)

Emperor vs Sherufalli Allibhoy on 27 November, 1902

October, 1902, certain stencil plates for the purpose of counterfeiting Messrs. Hubbock & Co. Limited's trade-mark on two kegs of paint; secondly ... October, 1902, at Bombay, sold two kegs to which a counterfeit trade-mark was affixed without taking reasonable precautions, &o.; thirdly, under Section
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Emperor vs Gopal Raghunath on 6 November, 1928

acquitted in the lower Court, were all privy to the counterfeiting and passing of false currency notes, and committed offences under Sections 489 Article ... prosecution sought to prove against the appellant in respect of the counterfeit note found originally on the person of Rajaram. But taking the charges
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Gopal Raghunath vs Emperor on 6 November, 1928

acquitted in the lower Court, were all privy to the counterfeiting and passing of false currency notes, and committed offences under Sections 489A , 489B ... prosecution sought to prove against the appellant in respect of the counterfeit note found originally on the person of Rajaram. But taking the charges
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next