Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 310 (1.08 seconds)

Santa Maya Rai vs State Of Sikkim on 10 May, 2018

Assistant Chemical Examiner and found to be counterfeit convincingly proves that the Appellant had used counterfeit currency-notes of ₹500/- denomination in her possession ... knowledge that the said currency-notes were counterfeit. The Appellant intended to use the said counterfeit currency-notes as genuine. The Appellant used the said
Sikkim High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 3 - B R Pradhan - Full Document

Section 26 in The Fugitive Economic offenders Act, 2018 [Entire Act]

punishable otherwise. 475 Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467, or possessing counterfeit marked material. 476 Counterfeiting device or mark ... Counterfeiting a property mark used by another. 484 Counterfeiting a mark used by a public servant. 485 Making or possession of any instrument for counterfeiting
Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1

Parthiban vs State Rep.By on 18 July, 2018

Kowsigan .... Appellants / Accused Vs State Rep.by Inspector of Police, CBCID, Counterfeit Currency, Prevention Wing, Chennai  600 002. .... Respondent / Complainant Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under ... Thereafter the seized counterfeit currency notes was examined by PW-4 and he concluded that the seized currency notes are counterfeit notes and sent
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next