present complaint and seeking relief
against the courier in (a) viz., directing first opposite party/courier to pay the amount
that may be ordered ... courier he is not personally aware of
the address furnished to the courier. The foreign buyer came to the Handloom Export
Council - Government of India
Complaint
NO.C-337/1999
Mrs. Mugdha Bathla,
Proprietor
M/s Memsahab
Exports
3, Priya
Darshni Apartments,
A/4 Paschim
Vihar,
New Delhi-110063 Complainant ... Memsahab Exports and
was engaged in the business of manufacturing, sale and export of readymade
garments. The OP is a Courier Company having its head
bank has taken against the courier. There is
5
no privity of contract between the complainant and the courier. Further the complainant
is not personally ... courier he is not personally aware of the
address furnished to the courier. The foreign buyer came to the Handloom Export
Council - Government of India
Apulaki Apartments,
Opp.Jawahar Nagar Police Station,
Garkheda,
Aurangabad, Maharashtra.
2. Unicorn Exports,
Through Manager Anuraj Jain,
A-13, Sector 2 Vaishali,
Near ... payment of
Rs.24,999/-. Respondent No.2 Unicorn Exports supplied mobile by
DTDC Courier on 30.7.2013. After opening box of courier it was
revealed
Videocon International Ltd vs The Manager, M/S Air State Courier on 7 December, 2009
Date
of filing:10.12.1999
] Date
of order:07.12.2009
MAHARASHTRA
STATE ... Exports Pvt.Ltd.,
S.No.273, Mahadeo Nagar,
Burhannagar, Ahmednagar,
Through its Authorized Singatory. APPELLANTS
(Org.Complainants)
VERSUS
The Manager,
M/s Air State Courier
Bank.
2.
Complainant sent a courier to the respondent Bank vide
Annexure-CWI/A through First Flight Couriers Ltd. It is admitted case ... should only be sent by courier to our Pathankot address. List of courier First Flight Courier,
Overnite courier service.
All charges of your bank
documents were entrusted to the bank not to the
Courier Company. In case the Courier Company has caused the
delay, the complainant does not have ... Courier Company, therefore, that Company was not a necessary
party. Due to delay in reaching the Export document, the purchaser
had to pay the damages
Credit Society v. M. Lalitha3, Skypak Couriers Ltd. v. Tata Chemicals Ltd. and Trans Mediterranean Airways v. Universal Exports and held thatthe remedy available under
well settled. In the case
of " Trans Mediterranean Airways Vs. Universal Exports ",
reported in [(2011) 10 SCC 316], one of the core issues ... Skypak Couriers
Ltd. v. Tata Chemicals Ltd. , [( 2000) 5 SCC 294]
and Trans Mediterranean Airways v. Universal
Exports , [(2011) 10 SCC 316] and held that
Skypat Couriers Ltd. v. Tata
Chemicals Ltd. ((2000) 5 SCC 294) and Trans Mediterranean Airways v.
Universal Exports ((2011) 10 SCC 316) and held that
