Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 66 (0.03 seconds)

Gopalakrishna Sharma vs Union Of India on 15 November, 1990

required training in the necessary trade. He was not a course completed Act Apprentice trained in the Railway establishment in the same trade. 3. Admittedly ... qualified candidates for the same trade in Mechanical Department and Course-completed Act Apprentice in the relevant trade in Electrical Department, but whereas all other
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Prajaj C

dispute that he has completed training period of three years and later came with an application that he being a holder of ITI needs ... Grade III (C & W). The required educational qualification was course completed Act Apprentice/ITI in Fitter/Welder/Electrician trades. Apparently, the applicant/respondent herein
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M Chellur - Full Document

Indian Rare Earths Ltd vs K.S.John

apprenticeship. A trainee outside the purview of the Apprentices Act is to be distinguished from an apprentice undergoing training in a designated trade in pursuance ... Apprentices Act provides for regulation and control of training of apprentices in trades and matters connected therewith. Therefore, exclusion of 'apprentice' in Section
Kerala High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - C V Rehim - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next