Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2873 (1.12 seconds)

Chairman vs The Registrar on 6 August, 2013

appointment to the Course Completed Act Apprentices is unconstitutional and illegal. It was averred that Section 22 of Apprentices Act makes it clear that ... Employees Union represents the Course Completed Act Apprentices. Case of 4th Respondent Union is that since the Act Apprentices were trained for three years
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Banumathi - Full Document

The Union Of India vs The Registrar on 12 June, 2009

Completed Act Apprentice on merits. While so, there was an advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates with 8th Std. pass for the Act Apprentice Course ... that under the Act Apprenticeship Act , it is not obligatory on their part to provide employment to the Course Completed Act Apprentices. However, as clarified
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abdul Hamid And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors. The General ... on 20 September, 2017

local candidates. 3. Admittedly, the 14 original applicants were course completed act apprentices, i.e. they fulfilled the eligibility criteria. However, their applications were ... provides that fresh face substitutes can be engaged from course completed act apprentices. These instructions do not envisage that the course completed act apprentices should
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - D Gupta - Full Document

Union Of India vs The Registrar on 13 October, 2014

qualification for the same as prescribed in the notification was Course completed Act Apprentices / ITI in the Trade of Fitter / Millwright Maintenance Mechanic / Mechanic Motor ... qualification, as notified, has specified the requirement, i.e., course completed Act Apprentices / ITI in the Trade of Fitter / Millwright Maintenance Mechanic / Mechanic Motor Vehicle
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next