Arbitration and Conciliation
(Amendment) Act, 2015 ................................................................. 62
II. Decision of Cox and Kings (I) and the Judicial Rectification of the
first misconception by Chloro Controls ... Petition (C) No. 21286 of 2024 Page 1 of 190
c. How Cox and Kings (I) contemplates determination of mutual
intention of Non-Signatories
partners and the LLP (respondent no. 2), and
4
Relied on Cox and Kings Ltd. v. SAP India ... proceedings. His
submissions are as follows: First, this Court’s decision in Cox and
Kings (supra) is not applicable to the facts of the case
lucidly
set out by the five-judge Bench of this Court in Cox and Kings
Limited vs. Sap India Private Limited and Another1 . Though
said ... with the judgments of this Court in Interplay
(Supra), Krish Spinning (Supra), Cox & Kings (Supra), Ajay
Madhusudan Patel (Supra) and ASF Buildtech (Supra) does
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
petitioner placed reliance on the decision
of the Supreme Court in Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd.1 to contend that ... arbitral proceedings. Relying upon the decisions of
the Supreme Court in Cox & Kings Ltd. (supra) and of the Karnataka High Court
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
Petitioner in
WP/1643/2010, WP/2477/2010.
Ms. Jane Cox a/w Mr. Vinayak Suthar i/by Mr. Manmohan A.
Amonkar, for the Petitioner ... reflect
the correct legal position.
14. Accordingly, we heard Ms Jane Cox, Mr R D Bhat, and
Mr Mayuresh Nagle for the workmen/unions
