relief would still be denied is the
question.
In Moody v. Cox [1917 (2) Ch 71], it was held:
"It is contended that ... quite
clear that the passage in Dering v. Earl of
Winchelsea 1 Cox, 318 which has been referred to
shows that equity will not apply
academic [see Union of India v.
Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd. and Cox and Kings (Agents) Ltd.
v. Workmen . Furthermore, an admission on the part
Works (P) Ltd. , (1976) 3 SCC 32,(Para 14) and M/s Cox and Kings
(Agents) Ltd. vs. Their Workmen and Others
classified under 'distant contact'.
The authorities like Taylor and HWV Cox in their treatises, state in
details as to how the post-mortem
copy of the order of the assessing authority in the case of Cox and Kings. A bare perusal of the said order shows that therein
decree who has paid his purchase
money into Court (Ayles v. Cox, 17 Bea. 584). The
committee of lunatic cestui que trust
property of the company.
14. In Abhilash Vinodkumar Jain v. Cox & Kings (India) Ltd. , (1995) 3
SCC 732 this Court had occasion to deal
would not
apply in the case of the concerned workmen.
Ms. Jane Cox, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent-Union
Equitable Remedies, Fifth Edition at page 5, referring to Moody v. Cox, (1917) 2 Ch. 71 at pp. 87-88 and Meyers v. Casey
Backbone Tarmat-Ng Jv vs National Highways Authority Of India ... on 18 May, 2002
Equivalent
