rejected the application of the petitioners filed under Section
205 Cr. PC for exemption from personal appearance.
2. The factual matrix as emerging from ... Court CR. MISC. No.23024 of 2016(10) dt.09-01-2024
3/17
have filed their application under Section 205 Cr. PC for
exemption
petition under Section 205 of Cr. PC was allowed before the examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr. PC and simply because ... examination under Section 313 Cr. PC. Having regard to the proviso to Section 313(l)(b) Cr. PC the earliest three-Judge Bench decision
rejecting the prayer for exemption from their personal appearance under Section 205 Cr. PC.
2. The circumstances leading to the above application are that ... learned Advocate and prayed for exemption from their appearance under Section 205 Cr. PC which was rejected vide order dated 20.09.2004.
4. Being aggrieved
next date i.e. on 19.01.2024 and the petition under Section 205
Cr.PC will be considered on his personal appearance.
6. Being aggrieved ... ailments. Under
such situation, the petitioner filed an application under Section 205
Cr.PC praying for exemption of personal appearance and represented
through the learned
after examining complainant under Section 200 of Cr. PC issued process under Section 204 of Cr. PC applying proper judicial mind in this case ... petitioners should be permitted to be represented under Section 205 of Cr. PC by their authorised Advocate. Accordingly, I direct that the warrant of arrest
Cochin does not appear to be insurmountable. The provisions of ` 205, Cr. PC. are well known and from the order of the learned Magistrate dated
PMLA, it would be governed by Sections 200 to 205 of the Cr.PC, as none of the
said provisions are inconsistent with ... filed, it will be governed by
Section 200 to 205 of Cr.PC. He submits that being a summons case, if the accused
does
PMLA, it would be governed by Sections 200 to 205 of the Cr.PC, as none of the
said provisions are inconsistent with ... filed, it will be governed by
Section 200 to 205 of Cr.PC. He submits that being a summons case, if the accused
does
tune and in line with the mandate of Section 205-E Cr. PC. After
passing the order dated 22.11.2011, the police authorities informed the Court ... bound to follow the procedure as envisaged under Section 205-E Cr. PC, in the
case. The learned magistrate has followed the procedure in breach
accused exempted Under Section 205 , Cr.PC could be examined Under Section 342 , Cr.PC did not come for discussion. It is true that ... Under Section 342 , Cr.PC by the Court, in place of the accused for whom he appears. Section 366 , Cr.PC further makes it clear
