cRE~m.1:3?3i.£H1(}1T1I«;R
F, _ L:<:A"r':<>:\'s1..EDUCAHON
S R Subramanyam vs State By Cbi/Spe on 6 December, 2010
Author: N.Ananda
ifig--~a.sA ;73e,_:K§*rcx_:,
Sub Division, Magadi Road, Banga§cre;'--._iS'heihaAs'~:1epoa'ednV"
that
NAGAR BANGALORE 32
RESPONDENT
(By Sri: S NAGARAJA, ADV.,)
2
CRE...A IS FILED u/s. 373(4) CR.P.C. 8\_'.-.__THE
ADVOCATE
orlselquence.
31. re1ied"'on documentary evidence
as per wh'cre.in stated that mobile phone bearing
No.80368$O'?95 VwasAA
PW12 ~--
cycle bearing registration Ngo._CRE\i/'i'»<_iA§6t_i', wh'iCiU'ias'v
by accused
dated / CIA N0 1480/ Ch'NO'188538
CrE.A.i\i0.274/ 22 O9 2005 2'0b5 dated
RESPONDEN'l'
(BA)/,4Sri._P;'EiI:iriinakar, HCGP)
CrE.P is fiied under Section 438 Cr.P.C
oragring to enlarge
Iuih Ccsur' maLj quash
11cc pI )W wi; a
cre;t cases where Liw ojienc 's with
demanded and accepted
dowry. of marriage, accused No.1 had
.1 cre'atedT"a row ground that weight of gold bracelet
less than