enmity with Pushpa. He received the dead-
body of his father and cremated him and did the final rites. After this,
he tried to inquire
witness-Himanshu that the petitioner was present in the
procession and cremation of the deceased. Thus, the presumption
of innocence in favour of the petitioner
that all the family
members of the complainant were there and the cremation was
about to be performed. The police team was also there
petitioner had
harassed the deceased for want of dowry and also cremated last
rites without conducting post-martem. So, looking to the gravity ... committed suicide. After that,
petitioner and his family members had cremated last rites without
conducting the post-martem. They had destroyed the evidence
deceased was admitted to the hospital
where she died and after the cremation ceremony, FIR was lodged
after a delay of four days
deceased, the body was handed over
to the petitioner for cremation. A baby boy is also living with the
parents of the petitioner
that complainant
in his FIR clearly stated that at the time of cremation of the
deceased, he had no doubt about the death of deceased
made out for entertaining the third bail
application as the deceased was cremated without waiting for the
relatives of deceased.
4. Accordingly, present Criminal Misc
Banwari Lal, father of the complainant died
on 28.4.2022. After cremation of the dead body, the nephew of
the complainant namely Manish S/o Mitthan
Banwari Lal, father of the complainant died
on 28.4.2022. After cremation of the dead body, the nephew of
the complainant namely Manish S/o Mitthan