Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Bombay High Court in M/s. Crescent Petroleum Ltd. Vs. "MONCHEGORSK " cited as AIR 2000 Bom 161. 15. During the course

written statement are totally irrelevant. Further, it has been held in Crescent Petroleum Ltd. v. 'Monchegorsk ' AIR 2000 Bom 161 that the term

High Court of Bombay in M/s Crescent Petroleum Limited v. Monchegorsk and Anr. reported in AIR 2000 Bombay 161: "It is well settled

Bombay High Court in M/s. Crescent Petroleum Ltd. Vs. "MONCHEGORSK " cited as AIR 2000 Bom 161. It is also a settled proposition

reported as 20021 (3) CCC 358 (373). In case of Crescent Petroleum Ltd. vs. M.V. "Monchegorsk " reported as AIR 2000 Bombay

that the plaintiff does not have an arguable case at all [Cresent Petroleum Ltd. v. M.V. "MONCHEGORSK ... pleadings is highly improbable or which may be difficult to believe [Crescent Petroleum Ltd. v. M.V. "MONCHEGORSK

Indlaw SC 199); Crescent Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. vs. Ram Naresh Tripathi 1992 Indlaw SC 788) and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. LIRD

management further cited : Crescent Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. 1993 Volum 1 LLJ 907 SC para 17, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union

natural justice would be violated. Hon'ble Apex Court in Crescent Dyes and Chemical Ltd. Ram Naresh Tripathi ... whole case law was reviewed by Apex Court in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs Maharashtra Genl Kamgar Union (1999) 1 SCC 626. 45. In present

provided for the same. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in Crescent Dyes and Chemicals Ltd Vs. Ram Naresh Tripathi laid down that ... concerned. The whole case law was reviewed by this Court in Bharat Petroleum Coporation Ltd Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union and it was held that