Rukmini Chemicals Ltd vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 5 December, 2022
Rukmini Chemicals Ltd vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 5 December, 2022
Author: Adarsh
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 490 (0.08 seconds)Mr.Ajay Kumar Gulati vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 10 November, 2010
sanction for
Prosecution" under section 197 Cr.P.C. for initiation of criminal
proceedings u/s 217 & 218 IPC of the following officials
Subhash Bhanwarlal Verma Lt ... vs The Pr. Commissioner-Hyderabad - ... on 10 October, 2025
hours, being FIR No.
217/17 under Section 41(2) and 102 of the Criminal Procedure Court. The
details of the FIR are as follows ... case was registered vide in Crime No. 217/2017 U/Sec 41(1)(b)/102
CRPC and took up the investigation. During
Anuradha Sardar vs National Commission For Women (Ncw) on 14 July, 2022
poor
Women violating the mandatory provision of the Code of Criminal
Procedure , 1973 as well as violating the Order passed ... poor Women violating the mandatory
provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 as well as violating the
Order passed
Punjab National Bank & Another vs The Reshabh Wimpro Pvt. Ltd. on 2 January, 2023
2023
ORDER
(Per: Justice D.S. Tripathi, President):
This revision petition under Section 47(1)(b) of the Consumer
Protection Act, 2019 has been preferred ... show-cause
as to why action under Section 340 of The Code of Criminal
Procedure , 1973; Section 217 and 218 of The Indian Penal Code
Surendra Kumar Jain vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 31 August, 2004
Surendra Kumar Jain vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 31 August, 2004
Equivalent citations
Ranbir Singh vs Comm. Of Police on 24 August, 2016
under Section 161 of Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973 (for short " Cr.PC ") and conviction slip etc.
(available at pages 182 to 217 ... entries, recovery memo etc.
and the statements recorded by the police u/s 161 Cr.PC
during the course of investigation of a criminal case
Anil Dutt Sharma vs Gnctd on 13 February, 2026
already been provided to you under section 207 Cr.P.C. In this
connection the appellant submits that the PIO has attempted to mislead ... mandatory periods of 7 years and taking cognizance is bar under section
468 Cr.P.C. so sought information cannot be denied. However, the appellant
Neeraj Singal, New Delhi vs Acit, Central Circle- 3, New Delhi on 31 October, 2018
Neeraj Singal, New Delhi vs Acit, Central Circle- 3, New Delhi on 31 October, 2018
Ms. Ravina Khurana, New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 26 March, 2018
Ms. Ravina Khurana, New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 26 March, 2018
IN THE