prepared to accept the contention that possession of the land would necessarily connote delivery of possession of the crop grown thereupon. On this point ... where the decree-holder is put in possession of land, such possession includes the standing crops; and the judgment-debtor cannot re-enter in order
that after the land so acquired with the standing crop was taken possession of by the Appellant he sold the crop to Moti ... delivery of possession, the handing over of the actual possession of the land on 13-2-63 and the existence of crops on the date
that after the
land so acquired with the standing crop was taken possession
of by the Appellant he sold the crop to Moti ... delivery of possession, the handing over of the
actual possession of the land on 13-2-63 and the existence
of crops on the date
land together with long possession, and he had on the strength of that apparent title and long possession raised the crops which the applicant removed ... grown the crops or wrongful gain to himself being aware that they had neither grown the crops nor were in possession of the land
that on the date when possession was taken there was standing crop. The possession has been taken by making Panchnama. It has been stated that ... land at the time of taking possession thereof, provided the possession is taken before passing award under Section 11 of the Act. In the instant
standing crop whose possession was taken before the award. If possession is not taken before the award, but if standing crop exists when the award ... risk of being deprived of the benefits of the crop, if the possession is taken before the crop can be harvested. If he, nevertheless, chooses
obtaining of the possession. In that application he prayed for the issue of a warrant of possession with crops standing on the land. In reply ... awarded immediate possession. In view of the fact that the respondent did not get possession of the land along with the standing crops, there
U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953
UTTAR PRADESH
India
U.P Consolidation of Holdings
settled possession, in the case of culturable
land, would be whether or not the trespasser, after having
taken possession, had grown any crop ... settled possession, in the case
of culturable land, would be whether or not
the trespasser, after having taken possession,
had grown any crop
actual possession of the
land. How such possession may be taken would depend on the nature of
the land. Such possession would have ... will ordinarily be treated as
sufficient to constitute taking of possession.
(iii) If crop is standing on the acquired land or building/structure exists,
mere