prays time for cross examination.
As no sufficient ground shown, cross examination
of PW1 taken as nil.
Issue ... sufficient ground is shown
to defer the cross-examination of PW-1 and closes the
cross-examination. It is the aforesaid order that has driven
recall any witness for further cross-
examination."
7. The cross-examination of every witness should follow
his examination-in-chief according to Section ... reserve the cross-examination to a subsequent date. The
accused is, therefore, not entitled as of right to
postponement of the cross-examination. The Court
recall any witness for further cross-examination."
7. The cross-examination of every witness should follow his examination-in-chief according to Section ... reserve the cross-examination to a subsequent date. The accused is, therefore, not entitled as of right to postponement of the cross-examination. The Court
therein to defer cross-
examination. He has stated in the said
application that the cross-examination of
witnesses may kingly be deferred after
completion ... petitioner, in which, prayer has been made to
defer the cross-examination of the witnesses
after completion of the prosecution witnesses.
On the face
therein to defer cross-
examination. He has stated in the said
application that the cross-examination of
witnesses may kingly be deferred after
completion ... petitioner, in which, prayer has been made to
defer the cross-examination of the witnesses
after completion of the prosecution witnesses.
On the face
accused prayed for deferring cross examination until
cross examination of CW.7 but trial court taken as cross
examination ... Sessions Judge allowed the
counsel to cross examine PW Nos.3, 4 and CW.7 and
deferring cross examination of PW1, rejecting the prayer
paper book page 106 that after his chief-examination was completed, the cross-examination was deferred at request to a further date. That would obviously ... trend of the cross-examination made by the appellant to P.W. 5 and others would reveal that the cross-examination has proceeded
dated October 18, 1960.) This request by the petitioner for deferring the cross-examination of the investigating officer, had been made presumably, to cross-examine ... cross-examined by the sub-inspector who was assisting the petitioner at the enquiry. No request was made to defer the cross-examination
cross-examination. Then on 22.12.2000,
the cross-examination of the accused was commenced.
The cross-examination runs about 5½ pages and further
cross-examination ... Then further cross-
examination of the witness was recorded on 31.01.2001.
Again four pages of cross-examination was recorded.
Again further cross-examination was recorded
Adjournments
granted for non-acceptable reasons - Calling of a
witness for cross-examination after a long span of
time, held, is anathema to concept ... principles relating to trial in a
requisite manner and not to defer cross-
examination of a witness at their pleasure or at the
leisure
