United
States, which are using its trademark for doing online trading in
cryptocurrency through their website(s) 'www.tatabonus ... which the respondents were found to
be offering for sale and exchange cryptocurrency by the name of "TATA"
coin. On search
which are in respect of lawful transfer of money through
cryptocurrency route, that too upon payment of requisite
commission amount, without anything else. Therefore ... applicant is
the person who has arranged for the funds through
cryptocurrency and witnesses namely Pragneshbhai PW
No.59 and Pravinbhai Ex.60 have given
Company. He told
them about the positive features in respect of Cryptocurrency. The
Applicant informed the Informant about a newly launched
Cryptocurrency by name Money ... recognized in different countries.
4. According to his claim, if the Cryptocurrency coins
were purchased between 15th to 17th July, 2017, the price would
Company. He told
them about the positive features in respect of Cryptocurrency. The
Applicant informed the Informant about a newly launched
Cryptocurrency by name Money ... recognized in different countries.
4. According to his claim, if the Cryptocurrency coins
were purchased between 15th to 17th July, 2017, the price would
Plaintiff that the Defendant No.1 was
dealing in a cryptocurrency called 'TATA Coin' / '$TATA' through both of
the impugned websites ... order to curb the
Defendant No.1's online trading in cryptocurrency business/services that
CS (COMM) 316/2021 Page 4 of 17
Signature
induced the defacto complainant to invest
money in a firm dealing with cryptocurrency. It is alleged that the
company in question simply vanished one fine ... petitioners were for purchasing
BAIL APPL. NO. 542 OF 2022
4
cryptocurrency already purchased by the petitioner and was not
for direct purchase
General Discussion On The Union Budget For 2022-2023. on 7 February, 2022
Seventeenth Loksabha
Defendant No.2 has a whitepaper published on its website relating to
cryptocurrency. Screenshots of the said website are extracted hereinbelow:
Signature Not Verified
Digitally ... consciously misleading
customers in the sense that there exists a genuine cryptocurrency platform or
a digital currency platform associated with the Plaintiff. The connection
with
Bitcoins. Respondent No.2
represented himself as a Stock Broker dealing with
Cryptocurrency, hence, the petitioner invested an amount of
Rs.75 lakh with respondent
keeping the said
money. Money was earned, was also used in cryptocurrency
and bitcoins purchased through various accounts.
Since the facts revealed during investigation
