State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November, 2003
State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 180 (1.47 seconds)Tata Consultancy Services vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 November, 2004
copyright version is not the
one which operates the computer of the customer but the physical
copy of that software which has been transferred ... very wide definition. He submitted that "goods" have been defined to
mean all kinds of moveable property except those specified, namely,
actionable claims
Imagic Creative Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes & Ors on 9 January, 2008
software would be subject to custom duty within the meaning of Section
2(22) of the Customs Act, defining goods. A three Judge Bench ... contain, would be goods as defined in Section
2(22) of the Customs Act.
21. Evidently, therefore, the decision of Associated Cement Company
Supra) whereupon
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Kalyani Breweries Ltd. on 21 May, 1999
which the duties of Customs shall be levied as specified in the first and second schedule appended thereto.
9. 'Customs Tariffs' have been ... food articles' admittedly had not been defined in the Customs Tariff Act . If the same had not been defined, the words
Rajinder Arora vs Union Of India And Ors on 10 March, 2006
purview of the
expression "smuggling" as defined in Section 2(39) of the Customs
Act read with Section 2(e) of the COFEPOSA
Sudhir Shantilal Mehta vs C.B.I on 7 August, 2009
defines "law" for purposes of
Article 13 to include "any Ordinance, order, bye-law,
rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having
State, Cbi vs Sashi Balasubramanian & Anr on 31 October, 2006
defined in rule 2 of the Central
Excise Rules, 1944;
(ix) exporter as defined in clause (20) of section 2 of
the Customs ... importer as defined in clause (26) of section 2 of
the Customs Act, 1962 (52) of 1962);
(xi) any person against whom proceedings have been
Commnr. Of Customs (Port), Chennai vs M/S Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd on 17 May, 2007
proper transaction value, in
terms of Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of
Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 (for short ... amend the law relating to customs. The terms 'goods' and
'import' have been defined in Section 2(22) and Section
Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... vs Suresh Jhunjhunwala & Ors on 19 October, 2006
followed.
"Prohibited goods" have been defined in Section 2(33) of the Customs
Act (for short "the Act") to mean ... Commissioner of Customs, stating :
"This appeal is filed against the judgment and
order dated 18th August, 2000 passed by the Customs,
Excise & Gold
Gurcharan Singh vs Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence on 1 April, 2008
that duty drawback having not been included in Section 135 of
the Customs Act prior to its insertion in 2003, the impugned judgment
cannot ... Customs Act , as they stood prior to
enactment of Customs Amendment Act, 2003.
Section 2(33) of the Act defines "prohibited goods