placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
placed on a judgment reported
in 2009 (2) SCC (Criminal) 593 (Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor,
Jammu versus Yashpal and another) it stipulates that the
provisions
parties
performed better." (Emphasis added)
13. In Hoffman Andreas v. Inspector of Customs, Amritsar ,
(2000) 10 SCC 430. The following passage is in this
parties to prove his innocence.
22. In Hoffman Andreas vs. Inspector of Customs, Amritsar ,
(2000) 10 SCC 430, the Supreme Court, while dealing with
which has landed at Gadhada sea
coast, by trucks, the Police Sub Inspector Mahuva
immediately left for Gadhada Village with his
Police Party. On cross ... Police Station, Mahuva immediately. The Police
Sub Inspector, Mahuva handed over the said loaded
truck to Customs Officer for further action under
the Customs