Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 48 (1.88 seconds)Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Haponmay Murmu vs The Commissioner on 2 May, 2025
rights of any village, such
records shall be conclusive proof of the rights and customs
therein recorded, other than the rights mentioned in Section
Pancham Rawani & Anr vs Alkhi Devi & Ors on 25 April, 2018
Parcha
(Gantzer Survey Settlement) and it is a conclusive proof that
property belongs to the Predecessor of the plaintiff only ... entries made in the Parcha is a legal and
conclusive proof of right and custom under Section 25 of
Santhal Settlement Regulation
Markus Murmu vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 December, 2024
been performed
as per their rites and customs and further, there is no proof of
marriage.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the revisionist
Kashika M. Prasad vs The State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2026
date of occurrence at around 08:00 there was no
customer though the accused visited his shop for five
minutes for checking the documents ... document related to his shop for
which he does not have any proof. He further admits that he
has no knowledge that the accused