respondent finding the petitioner guilty of Dishonest Abstraction of
Energy (DAE) and consequent demand for `2,44,647/-. This Court while
issuing notice ... impugned demand. The petitioner
denies that he has indulged in any DAE of which he has been found guilty.
W.P.(C) No.6585/2007
Kamal Dey vs Ugc-Dae Consortium For Scientific ... on 4 February, 2010
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,
Old JNU Campus ... 2009/003238
Appellant : Mr. Kamal Dey
(Tech - G),
UGC-DAE CSR, Kolkata Centre,
Sector-3, Block-LB-8, Bidhan Nagar,
Kolkata - 700098,
West Bengal
Respondent
Ajay Kumar Rathore vs Ugc-Dae Consortium For Scientific ... on 8 February, 2010
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,
Old JNU Campus ... 2009/003256,3259
Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rathore,
Scientific Assistant-C,
UGC-DAE CSR, Kolkata Centre,
Sector-3 Block-LB-8, Bidhan
Nagar, Kolkata
bill of
Rs.1,64,136/for dishonest abstraction of energy (DAE) was raised.
Plaintiff alleged that bill is illegal, baseless and frivolous ... dismissed as plaintiff is
trying to avoid his liability to pay the DAE bill; that suit is bad for non
joinder of registered consumer
date 27.07.2007 for the "Dishonest Abstraction of
Energy" (DAE) ) for nondomestic connection. The said bill pertained to
inspection dated 13.06.2007. In fact ... found stopped. Consequently, show cause notice dated
13.06.2007 was issued regarding DAE along with the said reports and the
plaintiff was called upon to attend
Cause
Notice dated 13.12.2007, regarding suspected Dishonest
Abstraction of Energy i.e DAE was served to the plaintiff
along with the meter report and load ... Officer reached to the
conclusion that it was a clear case of DAE under Delhi
Electricity Supply Code and Performance Standards
Regulations 2007 and Section
bill of
Rs.1,64,136/for dishonest abstraction of energy (DAE) was raised.
Plaintiff alleged that bill is illegal, baseless and frivolous ... dismissed as plaintiff is
trying to avoid his liability to pay the DAE bill; that suit is bad for non
joinder of registered consumer
comply with the mandatory
provision of DERC and no case of DAE was established against the
plaintiff.
3 Suit was contested by the present appellant ... that suit is not
maintainable as plaintiff is estopped from challenging the DAE bill as
the plaintiff had approached the defendant Co.and the theft
Limited
with inspection report, lab report and CD wherein the allegations of DAE were
made against it. This notice was duly replied by the plaintiff ... sent by registered post.
5. The falsehood of the case of DAE is further evident from the
fact that inspection report speaks of the meter
plaintiff in any manner.
3. Since there was no FAE/DAE and the speaking order has been
passed in this respect in a mechanical manner ... regulations which provided procedure to book and process
the case of DAE/DT is reproduced as under:
Page 4 of 11 S.C. Malik
