order relying upon the opinion of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari in Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India and others ... have left the question open. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari in his opinion however considered the issue and has held that the Constitution
Judge Bench of this Court, speaking through Dalveer Bhandari, J., observed : (SCC p. 197, para 25)
"25. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating
Mahajan , a two judge Bench of this Court, speaking through Justice Dalveer Bhandari, observed:
"25. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person
some of the parts of the concurring judgment authored by Justice Dalveer Bhandari (as His Lordship then was) with the aforesaid message, eloquently and impeccably
liable to be quashed. This argument was resisted by Shri Dalveer Bhandari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the detaining authority
Judge Bench of this Court, speaking through Dalveer Bhandari, J., observed : (SCC p. 197, para 25)
"25. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating
legislation. A recent Division Bench decision by the Delhi High Court (Dalveer Bhandari and H. R. Malhotra, JJ.) in Govind v. State (Govt
Bench presided over by the then learned Chief Justice, Mr Justice Dalveer Bhandari (as His Lordship then was) and Mr Justice S J Vazifdar
Ahmedabad [(1989) 3 SCC 568 : 1989 SCC (Cri) 655].
11. Mr Dalveer Bhandari relying on Section 5-A of the Act urged that the order
Judge Bench of this Court, speaking through Dalveer Bhandari, J., observed : (SCC p. 197, para 25)
"25. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating
