which the
Government changed (i) the designation of the petitioners from Data
Processing Assistants ... Data Entry Operators (and gave them a
particular scale) which according to them was reversion to an entry
grade below that of Data Processing Assistants
appellants could not retrospectively affect the initial
recruitment of appellants as Data Processing Assistants nor their
confirmation in 1989. Recruitment qualifications could not be altered
appellants
could not retrospectively affect the initial recruitment of
appellants as Data Processing Assistants nor their
confirmation in 1989. Recruitment qualifications could
not be altered
appellants could not
retrospectively affect the initial recruitment of appellants as
Data Processing Assistants nor their confirmation in 1989.
Recruitment qualifications could not be altered
Assistant
System Administrator & Procurement Assistant and one Assistant Library &
Information Officer are working on regular basis while one Office Assistant
(Transportation), one Senior ... Junior
Accountant Tally & MIS, one Technical Assistant IT, one Technical
Assistant, one Hostel Caretaker, one Data Processing Assistant, one Junior
Faculty Support, one Engineering
Data Entry 1600-2660 Degree + Diploma/
Operator Gr. Certificate in
'D'/ Data Computer
Processing Applications (part
Assistant 'A' Direct Recruitment ... Data Processing 1600-2660 1640-2900 12
Assistant-II
Data Processing New level 2000-3500 12
Assistant-I
iii) As the routine EDP work cannot
implicated in the case.
In defence evidence accused examined Rahul Saini, Data
Processing, Assistant, Office of Chief Medical Officer, Narnaul as
DW1.
After hearing arguments
question of their ri right
ght to the post of Data
Processing Assistants they were holding and to its scale - which
were matters common ... Government of India was passed on 2.7.1990 - then any
distinction between Data Processing Assistant
Assistantss who were
direct recruits and those who were promotees
appellants could not retrospectively affect the initial
recruitment of appellants as Data Processing Assistants
nor their confirmation in 1989. Recruitment
appellants
could not retrospectively affect the initial recruitment of
appellants as Data Processing Assistants nor their
confirmation in 1989. Recruitment qualifications could
not be altered
