Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 513 (6.68 seconds)

Subhash Chand vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 17 January, 2009

officer (EO) vide its finding dated 22.2.2006, on the basis of the statement of the prosecutrix that no rape was committed by the alleged delinquent ... discharge of the applicants. 7. However, the DA vide its disagreement note dated 17.10.2006 curtailing short the procedure of defence on disagreement proposed a major
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Ct. Suresh Kumar vs Gnct Of Delhi on 21 July, 2014

instituted through impugned Annexure-1 dated 16.06.2012, on the ground that the applicants act of forcefully raping a woman was tantamount to grave misconduct ... dated 16.04.2013 at Annexure A-3. The applicant submitted an appeal Memorandum against the order dated 16.04.2013, but the order of the Appellate Authority dated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 24 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Jayant Extraction Indus. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner Of Central ... on 18 May, 2004

dates shown in the W/B register, the same had been shown as issued for production on the subsequent dates. In respect of receipt ... accounted for. ----------------------------------------------------------------- S.No. Variety of Oil Date of Quantity Receipt (MT) ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Expeller Rape Seed Oil 11.12.85 9.850 2. Imported Soya
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sant Ram vs Comm. Of Police on 6 February, 2024

circular dated 28.12.1998 in which it has been provided that "the police officers involved in the cases of Rape or Decoity or any such ... Shri Luthra has also referred to a similar PHQ's circular dated 11.9.2007. 6.2 Learned counsel for the applicant has also referred
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs Chandigarh Police, Ut on 14 August, 2018

Punjab Police Rules, 1934; order dated 6.4.2015 (Annexure A-2), vide which the representation dated 29.1.2014 filed by the applicant for reinstatement in service ... been rejected, and also order dated 16.10.2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which his representation dated 12.6.2015, for reinstatement in service, on acquittal in the criminal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Himmat Singh vs Chandigarh Police, Ut on 14 August, 2018

Punjab Police Rules, 1934; order dated 6.4.2015 (Annexure A-2), vide which the representation dated 29.1.2014 filed by the applicant for reinstatement in service ... been rejected, and also order dated 16.10.2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which his representation dated 12.6.2015, for reinstatement in service, on acquittal in the criminal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Akshay Kumar vs Chandigarh Police, Ut on 14 August, 2018

Punjab Police Rules, 1934; order dated 6.4.2015 (Annexure A-2), vide which the representation dated 29.1.2014 filed by the applicant for reinstatement in service ... been rejected, and also order dated 16.10.2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which his representation dated 12.6.2015, for reinstatement in service, on acquittal in the criminal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Anil Kumar vs Chandigarh Police, Ut on 14 August, 2018

Punjab Police Rules, 1934; order dated 6.4.2015 (Annexure A-2), vide which the representation dated 29.1.2014 filed by the applicant for reinstatement in service ... been rejected, and also order dated 16.10.2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which his representation dated 12.6.2015, for reinstatement in service, on acquittal in the criminal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next