some courts/tribunals adopting Davies method enunciated in Davies v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd., (1942) 1 All ER 657.
Difference in two methods ... Apex court after detail consideration of the two methods preferred the Davies method. The principles cullled out by the Hon'ble Apex Court
cases falling under section 166 of the MV Act, Davies method is applicable.
21.We therefore hold that the multiplier to be used should
cases falling under section 166 of the MV Act, Davies method is applicable.
42. We therefore hold that the multiplier to be used should
Corporation v. Susamma Thomas . After exhaustive consideration, this Court preferred the Davies method to Nance method.
12. We extract below the principles laid down ... method of using Nance's method without making deduction for imponderables'.
'15. ?. Under the formula advocated by Lord Wright in Davies
After exhaustive consideration, the Hon'ble Apex Court
preferred the Davies method to Nance method. In Susamma
Thomas case the principles laid down ... hybrid method of using Nance's method without making deduction for
imponderables......Under the formula advocated by Lord Wright in Davies,
the loss
cases falling under Section 166 of the M.V.Act Davies method is applicable.
"21.We therefore , hold that the multiplier to be used
cases falling under section 166 of the MV Act, Davies method is applicable.
21. We therefore hold that the multiplier to be used should
cases falling under Section 166 of the MV Act, Davies method [Davies v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries
cases falling under section 166 of the MV Act, Davies method is applicable.
21. We therefore hold that the multiplier to be used should
account of adopting the method stated in Nance v. British Columbia Electric Railway Co. Ltd. 35 and the method in Davies v. Powell Duffryn Associated ... this Court in Susamma Thomas (supra) wherein preference was given to Davies method to the Nance method. Various paragraphs from Susamma Thomas (supra) and Trilok
