Near Elphinstone College vs Maharashtra Housing & Area Development on 6 March, 2014
Near Elphinstone College vs Maharashtra Housing & Area Development on 6 March, 2014
Author: S
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 817 (1.28 seconds)Paranjape Schemes & Associates, Shri ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 2 December, 2014
hence the definition of built up area
as per the DC Rules framed by PMC will prevail. It was stated that
similar view has been ... reiterated
that the definition of the built up area as per DC Rules of PMC
11
will apply and, therefore, the built up area
Madhusudanlal Narayanlal Pittie vs Maheshchandra Agarwal & Ors on 26 September, 2014
December, 2006. This was because
there were amendments to the DC Rules with regard to the grant of
FSI. The revised plans consequent upon ... amendment of DC Rules
were submitted in September, 2012.
18. NOC was for FSI 2.5. Thereafter in January, 2012 the DC
Rules came
Subhash.F. Bafna, Pune vs Department Of Income Tax on 26 June, 2014
present case, the
commercial user is allowed in accordance with the DC Rules and hence the
assessee was entitled to section 80-IB(10) deduction
Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd.,, Pune vs Assessee on 31 December, 2014
with four sets of completion plan under rule
7.6 of the DC Rules of the PMC. Thereafter PMC is required to return ... Certificate after inspection of the work under rule 7.7
of the DC Rules. Since Explanation (ii) to section
Hiranandani Akruti Jv, Mumbai vs Assessee on 16 April, 2014
approved
before 31.03.2004 and was within limits as prescribed by the DC Rules and Regulations,that
considering the direction of the Hon'ble High ... residential units with commercial use to the extent permitted under the DC
Rules/Regulations framed by the respective local authority.
ii.Where the commercial
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 vs M/S Happy Home Enterprises on 19 September, 2014
housing projects with commercial
user to the extent permitted under the DC Rules framed by the respective
local authority. In other words, it was known
Mangal Milan Co-Operative Housing ... vs Sudhir Shah And 3 Others on 12 November, 2014
decisions by all society members and
also more attributable to the DC Rules and Regulations amended in
the January 2012 that it would
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 vs M/S Happy Home Enterprises on 19 September, 2014
housing projects with commercial
user to the extent permitted under the DC Rules framed by the respective
local authority. In other words, it was known
Sharifbhai Hasambhai Sakrarayani vs State Of Gujarat & 23....Opponent(S) on 5 September, 2014
only if the permission applied for is strictly in
conformity with relevant DC Regulations. The competent
authority had no occasion to consider whether the plans ... appellants for development of their plot were
in accordance with DC Rules, 1967.
35. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case this