Rule 2.9 and Rule 13.3.11 of
the new D.C. Rules, which provide for amenity space which
according to him is necessary to be applied ... clarification issued under Rule 46 of
the new D.C. Rules have given sufficient clarity for which
proposals, the new DC Rules would apply
Rule 2.9 and Rule 13.3.11 of
the new D.C. Rules, which provide for amenity space which
according to him is necessary to be applied ... clarification issued under Rule 46 of
the new D.C. Rules have given sufficient clarity for which
proposals, the new DC Rules would apply
Rule 2.9 and Rule 13.3.11 of
the new D.C. Rules, which provide for amenity space which
according to him is necessary to be applied ... clarification issued under Rule 46 of
the new D.C. Rules have given sufficient clarity for which
proposals, the new DC Rules would apply
Rule 2.9 and Rule 13.3.11 of
the new D.C. Rules, which provide for amenity space which
according to him is necessary to be applied ... clarification issued under Rule 46 of
the new D.C. Rules have given sufficient clarity for which
proposals, the new DC Rules would apply
More so, it does not provide that the application
under Order 11, Rule 1 would not be applicable in
the proceedings other than suit ... counsel is present when the case is called for
hearing. Order DC Rule 9 provides for a remedy to the
petitioner to file an application
constructed there at in future by acquiring TDR
permissible as per DC Rules. The reply makes further reference to the further revised
sanctioned layout plan
Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. (Hereinafter
referred to as the 'DC Rules' for brevity). The said Act and
Rules only provide ... license to manufacture
a drug as contemplated under Chapter IV of the DC Act, is
entitled to export the drugs after fulfilling the requirements
finished under Rule
14/ 16 ofvsthe I:;!IheI--'e shsgglutcly no justification on
the part invoked Rule 19 of the Rules
and to « from ... same can still be imrokod dc-hpyfi:
Rules. It was thcmfore coxxtendefi
imroked aficr lfis conviction by .A
lflmufisisflmoonstiumoaalméiigjatg
following terms:
1. "Rule. Mr.NV Gandhi, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of
the respondent No.3 ? contesting party ... Rakesh Parikh appearing on behalf of Mr.DC Dave, learned
advocate, waives service of rule for the respondent
MAHESHBHAI PATEL & 1 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance :
MR
DC DAVE for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 3.
RULE SERVED
for Respondent(s) : 1,
MR AJ PATEL
