school and its activity under Rule 21 of the Rules and
Regulation. As per Rule 4 of this society, Administrator, Haryana Urban
Development Authority ... petitioner-school was set up by Sh.H.D.Shourie, the then DC Rohtak. In this
manner, all the affairs of the petitioner-school
That the Chandigarh Administration shall not resort to
formulate rules or bye-laws without prior consultation of the Heritage
Committee and prior approval ... that there is no such provision/interpretation in the
said Rules.
On this, the DC-cum-EO submitted that at present also,
Building Plans/Revised
application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC praying for striking out
the names of UCO Bank and DC, Gurugram (respondents/defendants ... also moved an application
for amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17, read with Section 151
CPC, seeking relief of possession
also charge sheeted
under Rule 7 of the Punishment Rules for committing irregularities
in recruitment of 21 instructors on DC rates. Similarly, respondent
provisions of Rule 17 of the Haryana
Revenue Department District Subordinate Group(C) Service Rules, 1988
(for short 'Rules, 1988'),the office ... power of the State Govt. under Rule 17 of the Rules, 1988 to relax
the application of the Rules. In pursuance of this provision
Service Bye Laws, 1977 (now PWRM&DC Employees Service
Bye Laws). Under the said statutory rules, the pay scales for the posts are
mentioned
time of transfer of the private respondents,
the Rule applicable were the Punjab District Subordinate Services Rules, 1942,
which do not provide any provision ... seniority list of Assistants issued by the DC, Panipat (Annexure P7). That apart,
Rule 11 of the 1988 Rules, mandates that the order of merit
emoluments of the petitioner re-
calculated as per Chandigarh DC rate as per relevant
rules and regulation, the arrears have been accordingly
calculated. In relation ... Nature of Balance Interest @ 6% Total Amount
No. Amount (Chandigarh per annum
DC rates from from 32
21.03.2016 to months (from
arguments on
Club Order 7, Rule 11 СРС.
2. RP/91/2022 DC Chaudhary v. M/s Spartans Club Already dismissed as withdrawn
Rule 1 CPC instead of Order 23 Rule 3(1) CPC . But even if the applicants have moved the instant application u/o 23 Rule ... application do not fulfil the requirements of the provisions of Order 23 Rule 1 CPC for the purpose of seeking the permission for seeking amendment
