2014
17.06.2005. Thereafter, their next promotion to the rank of DCIO/Tech-WT was
granted to them w.e.f. 01.07.2011. According to the applicants ... much earlier.
Nevertheless, the applicants joined their post in the rank of DCIO/Tech-WT on
01.07.2011. The applicants have further claimed that their next
Sangrur where he served under one A.K. Sharma, who acted as DCIO up to 31.03.2010 and subsequently under one VK Goel, DCIO ... denied that he discharged the duty of DCIO on the retirement of incumbent of that post. In fact, he was posted as outpost in-charge
Deputy Central Intelligence Officer-I/Tech/WT [hereinafter referred to as DCIO-I/Tech./WT] vis-`-vis his batch-mates including juniors. The applicant further ... Paswan, ACIO-I/WT requesting for promotion to the rank of DCIO/Tech(WT).
2. Shri A.K. Paswan was duly considered for promotion
including, the date from which post of ATO was re
designated as DCIO (Tech) and what are the higher posts above to the post ... DCIO
(Tech), what are the criteria for promotion from the post of ATO/DCIO(Tech) and other higher
posts, what was the sanctioned strength
including, the date from which post of ATO was re
designated as DCIO (Tech) and what are the higher posts above to the post ... DCIO
(Tech), what are the criteria for promotion from the post of ATO/DCIO(Tech) and other higher
posts, what was the sanctioned strength
defence that he
as prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
enkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him
to sign the attendance register and also brought ... surmises the
Inquiry Officer held the appellant guilty.
22. Mr. P. Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur, who
was the complainant and against whom appellant
::: Downloaded
meantime, the applicant also applied for the post of DCIO/Exe in IB on 11.05.2011 but the same was not considered for the aforesaid disciplinary ... fault on his part; rejection of his case for selection as DCIO, despite the fact that he had appeared in the interview; and willfully withholding
defence that he as
prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who
prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought ... 2017 19:03:11 :::HCHP
: 15 :
22. Mr. P. Venkateswarlu, DCIO,
Palanpur, who was the complainant and
against whom appellant alleged bias
.
refused to appear
defence that he
was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented
him to sign the attendance register and also
brought ... surmises the
Inquiry Officer held the appellant guilty.
22. Mr. P. Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur, who
was the complainant and against whom appellant
alleged bias refused
rank of JIO-II, JIO-I,
ACIO-II, ACIO-I and DCIO subject to the notification
given below:-
(i) In case
