Act and the Delhi
Land Reforms Act and the Panchayat Raj Act, then it would be the
provisions of the DMC Act which would prevail ... while the DD Act is Act 61 of 1957, the DMC Act is
Act 66 of 1957 and the DMC Act can thus be said
Whether the present suit is barred under the
provisions of Specific Relief Act ? OPD
3. Whether the suit land was acquired for planned
Development ... placed to the
disposal of DDA under section 22 (I) of DD Act free
from any encumbrances in the Union of India
Patents Act; (AA) that the appellants/plaintiffs had however failed to
comply with Section 8(2) of the Patents Act; the Indian Patent Office ... compliance of Section 8(2) of the Patents Act; (DD) that the
appellants/plaintiffs had not made out a prima facie case for grant
want of notice u/s
53-B of DD Act? OPD.
3. Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of Union
of India
landlord and tenant, the premises being outside the ambit of
the Rent Act and determination of tenancy, a decree for ejectment ... protection under said Section 53A of the
Transfer of Property Act, 1882;
(dd) that the appellant / defendant though in the written statement
filed
Section 32 of the Act to contend that the acts in violation of the
provisions of the Act even if committed outside India have
effect ... itself;
(cc) that the scheme of the Competition Act does not permit any
review / recall;
(dd) that the scheme of the Competition Act does
direct the respondents to implement Section 33 of the
Disabilities Act by equally bifurcating the vacancies among
the three categories of persons with the disabilities ... Section
33 of the Disabilities Act and that as per the Executive Order/O.M.
No.16-110/2003-DD.III dated 26.2.2013 issued
come in the way;
(dd) that the suit claim is within time under Section 39 of the
Indian Contract Act, 1872 read with Article
corporate name / trade mark / logo „DISHTV‟ is also protected under the
Copyright Act, 1957 ; (xi) that the plaintiff also has a website in the name ... after ten years changed the name of its service from DD Direct+ to DD Free
Dish. It is not the case of the defendant that
negotiable instrument (i.e. DD
for Rs.6 lacs) within the meaning of Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881 which describes „holder ... said negotiable instrument within the meaning of Section 9 of the said Act
inasmuch as the appellant/plaintiff at no time, for consideration, became
