same in the presence of the
respective land owners. The DDLR to make it
clear that, if anyone of them were to be absent ... copy of the
order, which shall be acted upon by the learned
DDLR without insisting for a certified copy. In the
event of any doubt
application was rejected on
18.10.2008. Thereafter, Kasimsab preferred an appeal
before the DDLR, Belagavi. In the meantime, he died on
9.11.2008. Plaintiffs prosecuted the said ... challenged before any Court of law. So far as proceedings
before ADLR, DDLR, JDLR and before the High Court in
the Writ Petition is concerned
both sides.
6. At the outset it must be noticed that the DDLR
in his order at Annexure-H has observed as follows:
"«ZÁgÀuÉ ... WÉÆö¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ."
7. Essentially in the finding of the DDLR there is
discrepancy regarding possession of the parties vis-à-vis
phodi
CHANDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
WORKING AS SURVEYOUR DDLR OFFICE,
CHITRADURGA 577527,
ALSO R/O DYAMALAMBA, DEVI NILAYA,
KUVEMPU NAGARA, HOSADURGA TOWN,
CHITRADURGA 577527.
...PETITIONER ... submitted
that the petitioner is working as Surveyor in the office of DDLR.
He is arrayed as accused alleging commission of offence
punishable under Section
KPSC for
FDA recruitment and he is to be the DDLR. When he was
visited the National B.Ed. college and Global Mahila ... records, which reveals that the respondent No.2 -
Shanker who is the DDLR, deputed for supervising 05
examination centers, for the recruitment conducted
brother. It was
challenged before the Deputy Director of Land Records
(DDLR). After the dismissal of the said appeal, the accused
have approached the Joint ... name. It was challenged by accused No.4-
Rajesh Agiwal before the DDLR. During the said
further submitted that the Deputy
Director of Land Records (for short 'DDLR') considered the
objections raised by the plaintiffs and others regarding phodi ... acre of land in survey No.45/04 were
cancelled by the DDLR and the D.C concerned.
23. In the backdrop of these specific
behest of
respondent Nos.5 to 20, the 2nd respondent-DDLR had prepared
a layout plan ... know that the JDLR was the
husband of respondent No.2-DDLR, whose order was
challenged by them before the JDLR and for that reason
Deputy Director of Land
Records (hereinafter referred to as 'the DDLR', for short)
and respondent No.5-ADLR to consider the representation
made ... considered opinion that the respondent survey-authorities
i.e., DDLR and ADLR are duty bound to conduct the phodi
and durasth and conclude the proceedings
order dated 17.12.2022 stated to have
passed by the respondent No.5-DDLR. It is the grievance of the
petitioner that though the petitioner ... neither notified nor
given any opportunity prior to respondent No.5-DDLR passing the
order dated 17.12.2022 pursuant to which the impugned notice is
issued
