Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Writ Petition No.2192 of 2005 the accused filed application seeking de-exhibiting of the documents filed by PW 1 with his evidence on affidavit

Evidence Act to de-exhibit the document once exhibited in evidence, cannot be found fault with. However, such exhibition of documents shall be in accordance ... exhibited as Exhibits 3 to 9, that itself did not constitute exhibition of those documents in evidence. Besides, the endorsement itself disclosed that the exhibition

chief was filed on 27.8.2009, filed an application Exh.82 for de-exhibiting the document. The trial Court vide its order dated 8.6.2011 rejected ... assailed the order below Exh.82, rejecting his application for de- exhibiting the said document in the present Writ Petition. 7. Mr.Totala, learned counsel

2002 below Exh. 287, which application is filed by accused for de-exhibiting the documents, Exh.290, which application is filed by accused for summoning ... read in evidence as secondary evidence and as such, same be de-exhibited. However, under the impugned order, request of accused is not allowed

Judgment.odt application at Exhibit 71 for adjournment. He made an application at Exhibit 73 for de-exhibiting the document marked as Exhibit ... exhibited. Similarly, the document marked as Exhibit 69 was exhibited contrary to the order passed by this Court. Therefore, the same shall also be de

filed an application (Exh.137) before the trial Court praying for de-exhibiting the said document and the additional affidavit in evidence filed on behalf ... said application on the ground that there was no provision for de-exhibiting the document. By order dated 17.03.2016, the aforesaid application filed

witness, D.W.-1, Ajit Shah and requesting this Court to De-exhibit the same, by setting aside the impugned order to that effect, passed ... premature a stage to contend that this document be de-exhibited. 33] Once it is held that the document is essential and will be helpful

2009 by which application filed by the petitioner (original accused) for de-exhibiting documents came to be rejected. 3. Smt. S.W. Deshpande, learned Counsel ... petitioner has submitted that the documents which are prayed to be de-exhibited by filing application at Exh.94 before the trial Court was mainly

filed an application (Exh.137) before the trial Court praying for de-exhibiting the said document and the additional affidavit in evidence filed on behalf ... said application on the ground that there was no provision for de-exhibiting the document. By order dated 17.03.2016, the aforesaid application filed

Exhibit 72 by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Koregaon. The contents of the statements marked as Exhibit 67, 68 69 were to be de- exhibited ... Exhibit nos. 67, 68 & 69 cannot be proved through evidence of P.W. 1. (iv) Statement at Exhibit 70 also be de-exhibited