Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Shebaits do not require any permission from the Court to transfer the debutter property for the overall benefits of the debutter/deities

right of the plaintiff, claiming to be that the same is debutter property. The petitioner herein in the said suit, filed an application for temporary

case of the petitioner that his property belongs to debutter estate which comprises of a Kalari and a temple, against which the 4th respondent

dilapidated condition and due to dearth of adequate income of the debutter estates, no repair or renovation work is possible. He submits that condition ... paid every year. It is found that the financial condition of the debutter estates is not good and both the temples situated at Bhanja Bati

13th November, 2024 in the name of Shri Shri Iswar Sreedhar Jew Debutter Estate. Let the proposal of the proposed purchaser along with the Demand

differences, interferences as well as the peaceful ambience in respect of the debutter property is concerned. In view of the aforesaid contentions, I direct

petitioners on being found that the property in question is debutter property. It is submitted by the learned advocate representing the petitioners that in this

cottahs. Under the said 2 Arpannama while creating the said property as debutter property by installing the said deities, two sebaits were appointed

appellate court go wrong in finding the plaint schedule property to be debutter property? 3) Did the first appellate court go wrong in nullifying Exhibit

learned advocate. The petitioner claims to be a Shebait of the Bhukailash Debutter Estate situated at 49/1 and 49/2C, Karl Marx Sarani, Ward