ROUNDER" and the expression "ALL-AROUND
PROTECTION" are not deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s registered mark
"ALLROUND". Reliance ... INDIA". The High
Court in that case , found there to be deceptive resemblance between the
words RUSTON and the mark RUSTAM and hence
trade mark „Genesis SKYON‟ or any other trade mark which
may be deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s trade mark „IREO SKYON‟.
Other connected reliefs ... said impugned trade
mark or using any trade mark which is deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s
trade mark till pendency of the Suit
Using the depiction of the Plaintiffs' product or any other
product deceptively similar to that of the Plaintiffs' in its
advertisement ... completely free to recall ―commercial speech‖
which is false, misleading, unfair, deceptive and which proposes
illegal transactions.
12. In Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan
restrained the defendants from using the impugned
mark or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s mark
„CENTRAL PARK‟. The defendant was directed ... fixed their name „Godrej with the word „Central Park‟ making it
deceptively and confusingly similar. It is stated that Godrej is not a
distinguishing feature
marks or any
other mark that is either identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's
BMW Marks. Other connected reliefs are also sought ... pleaded that the defendant's mark DMW is deceptively similar to
the plaintiff's BMW marks. It is pleaded that this
defendants also tentamount to passing off on account of confusion and
deception. It is also stated that the acts of the defendants are causing
irreparable ... tagline.
(iv) It is pleaded that there is likelihood of confusion and deception, if the
defendants are permitted to use the tagline/trademark NWTK
sign/ device/ name or domain name, which is identical with
and/or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs well-known,
registered and earlier BURJ Marks [including ... sign/ device/ name/ shape or domain name, which is identical
with or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff s well-known and
earlier BURJ Marks amounting
impugned trade mark „DECITAS‟ or any other mark
which is structurally or deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s registered trade
mark „DECITEX‟ registered under Class ... across defendant‟s
product under the impugned trade mark DECITAS which is deceptively
similar to the plaintiff‟s trade mark DECITEX. Further the defendant
domain name
is bound to cause and create confusion, misconception and deception and is
further likely to cause enormous damage and harm to the plaintiff ... 1489/2013 Page 3 of 18
„CRAYONS‟ in order to create deception and misconception.
5. The plaintiff after coming to know about the defendant
LADLI/SHUDH LADLI or any other mark/name, which is identical or
deceptively/confusingly similar to the plaintiff‟s trademark LADLI/SABKI
LADLI ... LADLI/SHUDH LADLI or any other mark/name,
which is identical or deceptively/confusingly similar to the plaintiff‟s
trademark LADLI/SABKI LADLI
