products under the mark "MUMUM" which, it is
alleged, is deceptively similar to the trade mark "MUMMUM", used
by the plaintiff ... aforesaid trade mark, which the defendant
was seeking to have registered, was deceptively similar to the trade
mark of the plaintiff, pre-grant oppositions
injunction, against use, by the defendants, of 'Pe' or any
deceptive variant of 'PhonePe' which is identical and/or similar ... marks " "
" " and " " as they were deceptively similar to the
plaintiff's trademark "PhonePe
Seed
Digestive" biscuits in packing which is, according to the plaintiff,
deceptively similar to the packing in which the plaintiff sells its "Nutri ... Protogreen Retail
Solutions Pvt. Ltd.2. On the aspect of deceptive similarity, this Court,
after perusing the decisions in Satyam Infoway (P) Ltd. v. Siffynet
ARMOR‖ part of the mark,
a font, style and lettering which is deceptively similar to that used by
the plaintiff for ―ARMOUR‖. Even while using ... marks. All that is needed, for possibility of
confusion or deception to be said to exist, is for the customer to
9
29. Infringement
well as ―IMPERIAL BLUE‖ trademarks.
30. The defendant emphatically denies any deceptive similarity
between the marks ―BLENDERS PRIDE‖ and ―CASINOS PRIDE‖.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally ... infringement by combining two marks and alleging
that a case of deceptive similarity is made out. Besides, learned
Senior Counsel submits that the defendant
dealing in any goods (particularly cosmetics), using any mark/name
identical or deceptively similar to the aforesaid registered trademarks
of the plaintiff ... NATURE'S TATTVA", of the defendants, is closely identical
and deceptively similar to the registered trademark
"NATURE'S ESSENCE
plaintiff alleges that
(i) the marks ―GLUCO-C‖ and ―GLUCO-D‖ are deceptively
similar to the plaintiff's registered trade marks ―GLUCON ... plaintiff's product
as to exacerbate the possibility of confusion and deception for
the purposes of Section 29(2)(b)1 of the Trade
Delhi and on third party e-commerce interactive websites,
which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's medicine under the
trademark PANTOCID and PANTOCID ... convenient corruption of the plaintiff's mark PANTOCID
and is deceptively similar to it, the only difference being the
intervening "PA" between
proprietor of the trade mark, -
(a) applies such trade mark or a deceptively similar mark to goods or services or
any package containing goods ... uses any package bearing a mark which is identical with or deceptively similar
to the trade mark of such proprietor, for the purpose of packing
earlier mark to which the defendant's mark
was deceptively similar. The adoption of the impugned marks by the
defendant was, therefore ... plaintiff
sought to contend that there was no likelihood of confusion or
deception vis-à-vis the cited earlier marks, as the application
