defendants from
using the trademark, PARALITE or any other trademark deceptively
similar to the plaintiff's trademark, PARACHUTE and PARACHUTE
LITE in relation ... lead to deception and confusion.
23. Thus, it appears to the Court that the trademark used by the
defendants is deceptively similar to the trademark
FECONTIN-F product of the Plaintiff. The trademark FEMICONTIN
is also deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs CONTIN family/series of
marks and the trademark FECONTIN ... restraining them from using the trademark
FEMICONTIN or any other trademark deceptively similar to the
Plaintiffs CONTIN series of trademarks and the trademark
FECONTIN
using (firstly) the trade
mark BRIGHT, which is confusingly and deceptively similar to the Plaintiff
No.1's registered trade mark SPRITE, and (secondly ... mark FUNS UP,
which is confusingly and deceptively similar to the plaintiff No.1's
registered trade mark THUMS UP. Further the defendant
deceptively similar to „ARISTOC‟
the House of Lords came to the conclusion that both sounds are very
similar. Similarly in the case ... same product is likely to cause confusion and
deception and it is deceptively similar with the registered trade mark of
the plaintiff i.e. ZEGNA
impugned trade mark
"OLIVE" is identical with and/or deceptively similar to "s.Oliver" trade
mark, trade name and domain name ... course of trade, a mark
which is identical with, or deceptively similar to, the
trade mark in relation to goods or services respect of
which
which are alleged to be
infringed by the use of a deceptively similar mark SIMPLEX by the
respondents.
2. Relevant facts as per petition ... said marks and
the respondent by using/threatening to use a deceptively similar mark
SIMPLEX as a part of trading style grossly violated the stipulations
manufacture and marketing of half bar washing
soap with the deceptively similar mark 507 and in wrappers- which
was colourable imitation of 501 half ... competing wrappers including the numerals gives an overall
effect of deceptive similarity which constitutes an infringement of the
trademark of the plaintiff in the numerals
using the trademark
RANA or any other identical or deceptively similar mark in
respect of the impugned goods in relation to metal building
materials, pipes ... products, CTD bars,
angles, flats, rounds, channels and girders which is deceptively similar
to the trademark of the plaintiff RANA/RANATOR and such
letter dated 18th September, 2003, stating that the
proposed mark was deceptively similar to plaintiff's mark.
15. Defendant No. 1 and/or related ... applicants. In
any case, admittedly, all applications for ROLEX and/or deceptively
similar marks in the name of defendant No.1's related parties
superior quality of goods, even
the two trademarks have become deceptively similar.
29. In order to establish infringement, the main ingredients of Section ... defendant's
mark is identical with or deceptively similar to the registered trade mark; and
the defendant's use of the mark
