passing off trademark "AAJ
TAK" or any other trademark deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered
trademark ... contended that the impugned trademark "Nazar AAJ TAK" is
deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' registered trademark
under the trademark/name 'VEZION' and
logo or otherwise deceptively similar to the marks of the plaintiffs, including
as a part ... selling mobile phones handsets and using the logo which is deceptively
similar to the plaintiffs' logo as stated in para 23 of the plaint
using any other name or
mark which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' trademark "India Today"
or any part thereof. The Plaintiffs
plaintiffs. The use of the said trademark or any trademarks
similar to the said trademark, by any other entity without the consent or
license ... infringing mark "LUCKNOW WALE
TUNDAY KABABI" which is identical/deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs'
registered and well known trade mark „TUNDAY KABABI
said trademark/name of the plaintiff BHAIJI ATTARWALE
which are same/similar/identical to the plaintiff's said trademark/name in
each and every ... plaintiff that the impugned trade mark/label
is identical with and deceptively similar to the said trade mark/name of the
plaintiff. It is contended
label POLICE GUY'S or any other mark identical or deceptively
similar to the plaintiff's second trade mark GUY'S DANG
plaintiff that defendants have no reason to
adopt the identical/deceptively similar marks as that of plaintiff as the very
source of adopting the first ... Defendants lacks bonafide. The goods and services are sold under the
deceptively similar trade mark will also lead to passing off the goods and
services
Punjab National Bank vs Ms. Bharti Sehgal And Anr. on 2 November, 2017
Author: Jayant
