trademark ZINCOVIT under
No.487453 in class 5 by using a deceptively similar trademark ZINKOWIT
or any other trademark deceptively similar to the plaintiff ... other
materials bearing the trademark ZINKOWIT label or any mark deceptively
similar to plaintiffs' trademark and artistic work ZINCOVIT label; (f) a
preliminary decree
layout of their trademark
NEUROVIT or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar to the
plaintiff's registered trademarks in its colour scheme, getup ... judis
NEUROVIT label or any mark deceptively similar to plaintiff's trademark and
artistic work NEUROVIT label. And (e) a preliminary decree be passed
layout of their trademark
NEUROVIT or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar to the
plaintiff's registered trademarks in its colour scheme, getup ... judis
NEUROVIT label or any mark deceptively similar to plaintiff's trademark and
artistic work NEUROVIT label. And (e) a preliminary decree be passed
mark
HOBBS or any other mark which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's
mark HOBSONS.
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page ... Upon noticing the alleged deceptively similar mark HOBBS in
the market recently in January, 2022, the suit and the present application
were filed. According
name NETSWEEPER owned by the Plaintiff and / or any identical or
deceptively similar trademark / tradename to that of NETSWEEPER in any
manner whatsoever;
(c) Permanent ... tradename
NETSWEEPER owned by the Plaintiff and / or any identical or deceptively
similar trademark / tradename to that of NETSWEEPER and thereby
passing off their products
name NETSWEEPER owned by the Plaintiff and / or any identical or
deceptively similar trademark / tradename to that of NETSWEEPER in any
manner whatsoever;
(c) Permanent ... tradename
NETSWEEPER owned by the Plaintiff and / or any identical or deceptively
similar trademark / tradename to that of NETSWEEPER and thereby
passing off their products
shown
in Document No.2 or other deceptively similar trade mark used in the
pouches and packets in respect of masalas; (d) directing the defendant ... Whether the label used by the defendant is
substantially or deceptively similar to the registered label
of the plaintiffs?
(4) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled
mark AROKYA by using the
mark AROGYA NATURAL or any other deceptively similar mark in
any manner whatsoever causing infringement under section ... AROGYA NATURAL or any other mark or trade name which is
deceptively similar or identical to the Plaintiff's trademark AROKYA
in any manner
mark which is in any way visually, or
phonetically identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' registered
Trade Mark TEXMO or in any manner ... mark which is in any way visually, or
phonetically identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' registered
Trade Mark TEXMO or in any manner
offending Trade Mark “SUBHA
MANGALA DEEPAM” or any mark or word deceptively similar to the
aforesaid Trade Mark of the plaintiff's for lamp ... other words or mark and offending packing
Material and pouch deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade mark
“DHEEPAM”.
(c). For preliminary decree directing
