using any other Trademark which is in
any way visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered
Trademark "AACHI MASALA KULAMBU CHILLY POWDER ... using any other Trademark which is in any way
visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' said registered
Trademark or in any manner infringe
using any other Trademark which is in
any way visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered
Trademark "AACHI MASALA KULAMBU CHILLY POWDER ... using any other Trademark which is in any way
visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' said registered
Trademark or in any manner infringe
using any other Trademark, which is in anyway visually,
and deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered Trademark "AACHI ... using any other Trademark which is in any
way visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered Trademark
No.838786
using any other Trademark
which is in any way visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs'
registered Trademark "AACHI & Aachi ... using any other Trademark
which is in any way visually, and deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs'
registered Trademark No.838786
using any other Trademark
which is in any way visually, and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs'
registered Trademark "AACHI & Aachi ... using any other Trademark
which is in any way visually, and deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs'
registered Trademark No.838786
marks
AQUATEC / AQUATEC ENGINEERS' or any other mark identical or
deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered Trademarks AQUA GROUP,
AQUATEX, AQUASUB, AQUASUB ENGINEERING ... other trade mark which is in any way visually, phonetically and
deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered Trademarks AQUA GROUP,
AQUATEX, AQUASUB, AQUASUB ENGINEERING
marks of the
defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly identical or
deceptively similar?
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction in respect ... mark of the defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly
identical or deceptively similar. In order to determine this issue, it is
necessary to compare
marks of the
defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly identical or
deceptively similar?
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction in respect ... mark of the defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly
identical or deceptively similar. In order to determine this issue, it is
necessary to compare
marks of the
defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly identical or
deceptively similar?
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction in respect ... mark of the defendant are phonetically, structurally or ocularly
identical or deceptively similar. In order to determine this issue, it is
necessary to compare
using the name AACHI NAGARATHAR VEG RESTAURANT or
any other similar Trademark name or similar sounding expression in any
media and use the same board ... other Trademark / name which is in anyway visually, and
deceptively or phonetically similar to the 1st plaintiff's Trademark / name
AACHI / AACHI CHETTINAD RESTAURANT
