trademark BILTEN
under No.4246358 in Class 5 by using a deceptively similar
trademark BELATIN or any other trademark deceptively similar to
the plaintiff ... stocking, using, advertising their
products with a trademark BELATIN which is deceptively similar to
the plaintiff's BILTEN trademark or in any other manner
other registered
trademarks by using trademark ZINOLVITA or any other trademark
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark or in any
other manner ... other materials bearing the
trademark ZINOLVITA label or any mark deceptively similar to
plaintiffs' trademark and artistic work ZINCOVIT label;
(e) a preliminary decree
other registered
trademarks by using trademark ZINOLVITA or any other trademark
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark or in any
other manner ... other materials bearing the
trademark ZINOLVITA label or any mark deceptively similar to
plaintiffs' trademark and artistic work ZINCOVIT label;
(e) a preliminary decree
LatePe" marks; and/or any other mark identical and/or deceptively similar
mark including the Apps BundlePe
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details ... LatePe" marks, and/or any other mark identical and/or
deceptively similar mark including the Apps BundlePe
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details
connected with NAIDU HALL mark or any
other deceptively similar Trade Mark carrying such
infringing manner of use in respect of impugned goods ... Mark label
"NAIDU HALL" by use of identical or deceptively
similar trade dress, colour scheme, artistic work, get-up
and placement of expression
artistic work of the defendant. The
defendant is using the deceptively similar mark of the plaintiff. The use of
the trademark “VIJAI” is bound ... infringement of Copyright ?
(iv) Whether the defendant's trademark is
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark ?
(v) Whether the defendant has committed
artistic work of the defendant. The
defendant is using the deceptively similar mark of the plaintiff. The use of
the trademark “VIJAI” is bound ... infringement of Copyright ?
(iv) Whether the defendant's trademark is
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark ?
(v) Whether the defendant has committed
other Trade Mark which is in any way visually, phonetically or
deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's Trade Mark and to restrain
the defendants ... other Trade Mark which is
in any way visually, phonetically or deceptively similar to the
3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded
MONK?
5. Whether the first respondent's trade
mark is deceptively similar to the
petitioner's trade mark?
6. Whether the adoption ... relation to whether the impugned marks
are deceptively similar to the petitioner's mark. The petitioner's
mark is an unusual and unique
last submission of learned counsel was that the registration of
deceptively similar trade marks by the 1st respondent is likely to cause
deception or confusion ... case of the petitioner is that the
impugned marks are deceptively similar to those adopted and used by the
petitioner. This contention is not denied
