products
by using mark 'Babu' which is identical and deceptively
similar to the plaintiff's trade name / trade mark 'Babu ... products lime under trademark "BABU", which is
identical and deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark "BABU
trade mark
GEMIMAC or any mark identical with or deceptively similar to the
Plaintiff's reputed trade mark GERIMAC as their trade mark ... there
is a phonetic and/or visual similarity and that such similarity
between competing trade marks is deceptive and confusing then
injunction ought
trade mark
GEMIMAC or any mark identical with or deceptively similar to the
Plaintiff's reputed trade mark GERIMAC as their trade mark ... there
is a phonetic and/or visual similarity and that such similarity
between competing trade marks is deceptive and confusing then
injunction ought
otherwise dealing in any other manner whatsoever in instant mix
bearing the similar trade dress and trade mark of instant mix
products ... whatsoever in goods sold under trade
mark, which is identical and deceptively similar to the plaintiff's
trade mark so as to infringe
trade mark ýSOMCIDýý
and/or any other trade mark which is deceptively similar/or imitation
of the plaintiff's registered trade mark ýSOCIDýý amounting
trade mark ýSOMCIDýý
and/or any other trade mark which is deceptively similar/or imitation
of the plaintiff's registered trade mark ýSOCIDýý amounting
trade mark ýSOMCIDýý
and/or any other trade mark which is deceptively similar/or imitation
of the plaintiff's registered trade mark ýSOCIDýý amounting
trade mark ýSOMCIDýý
and/or any other trade mark which is deceptively similar/or imitation
of the plaintiff's registered trade mark ýSOCIDýý amounting
trade mark ýSOMCIDýý
and/or any other trade mark which is deceptively similar/or imitation
of the plaintiff's registered trade mark ýSOCIDýý amounting
Ghaghal Ranchhodbhai Amarabhai vs Bhanjibhai Devshibhai Luhar & 4 on 21 January, 2014
Author: K
