disputed label at annexure-D)
which is also identical and/or deceptively similar to that
of the plaintiffs' suit labels. Therefore, the plaintiffs have ... 2022 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 22/12/2022
identical and/or deceptively similar label in the business
of identical goods i.e. tea after executing
Simero". That the defendant has adopted the
identical and deceptively similar trade mark, which cause
confusion and deception amongst the public at large.
Page ... order restraining the defendant from using the
trade mark, which is deceptively similar to the trade mark of
the plaintiff.
3. Heard learned advocate
challenge that finding. If the respondent's trade mark is
deceptively similar o that of the appellant the fact that
the word 'INDIA ... Such right is invaded by
anyone using the same or some deceptively similar mark,
get-up or name in relation to goods not of plaintiff
trademark AXPERT , whereas the
defendant has started using the deceptively similar
trademark EXPERT recently. According to the
plaintiff, the defendant is very well within ... plaintiff's registered trademark, has adopted identical
and/ or deceptively similar trademark EXPERT. That,
defendant applied for registration of trademark
before the Trade Mark
trademark
SHEETAL PEPCEE and MAYUR PEPSY, which is identical and
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark. That the
defendant ... 2022
SHEETAL PEPCEE and MAYUR PEPSY as identical and
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark. It has also
denied that the plaintiff
trademark of the plaintiff. That by
misuse of identical and / or deceptively similar
trademark, the defendant is committing act of
infringement and passing
appears that the wording and music of both the songs
are deceptively similar and the defendants have copied
"Char Bangadi Wari Gadi' from
That the impugned work of the defendant is
highly identical and deceptively similar with the plaintiffs' work
and as such there is every possibility
discrimination cannot hold good when the sets of
persons are not similarly situated. The Supreme Court
in Union Territory, Chandigarh v. Krishan Bhandari ... which is operated for different class of
the employees. There is no deception discrimination
to the petitioners as sought to be viewed by learned
Single
Devshi Gangaji Rabadiya vs Jayantibhai Jerambhai Sureja on 16 September, 2022
Author: A. P. Thaker
