Hindi"
and "republichindi.com" by the defendant are deceptively similar to that of the
trademark of the plaintiff. The plaintiff being ... colour scheme and the words used by the defendant being deceptively similar
with those used by the plaintiff, the defendant is guilty of passing
defendant is selling pressure cookers bearing an identical and/or
deceptively similar label as that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff had
2
issued a cease ... label used by the defendant is neither similar nor
deceptively similar. There are a number of differences between the
plaintiff's label
ADVANCE" and "ADVANCE GEAR" respectively by using deceptively
similar words for their products.
Learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiff draws the attention ... parties and submits that, the packaging used by the
defendants is deceptively similar to the one of the plaintiff. The same colour
combination is used
submits that, the defendant is marketing the same product using deceptively similar
trade mark with the colour combination label and package being deceptively similar that ... appears that the colour combination of the two packets are
deceptively similar. At a distance one cannot make a difference between "Super Chand
Tara
respect of their
products. He submits that, the defendants are using deceptively similar marks as that of
2
the plaintiff. Referring to the registration available ... packaging for marketing their products. They are using words deceptively similar to that
of the plaintiff.
Prima facie, two words NAKODA SumEET used separately with
submits that, the mark of the defendant is deceptively similar to that of the
plaintiff. He draws the attention of the Court to the actual ... that, the defendant is also using a domain name which is deceptively similar to
that of the mark of plaintiff.
In the present case
internet. The
defendant no.1 is displaying the goods bearing deceptively similar marks as that
of the registered trade mark of the petitioner ... selling goods bearing trade marks
2
deceptively similar to that of the registered trade mark of the petitioner on the
portal of the defendant
mark. The mark is registered. The defendants are using a deceptively
similar mark, which is causing prejudice to the business of the plaintiff ... petition, it appears that, the defendants are using a deceptively similar mark on its
product. The parties apparently deal in electric fans.
In such circumstances
using the trademark 'SONY" or any other trademark deceptively similar
thereto. The plaintiff also seeks perpetual injunction restraining the
defendants from passing
word
mark DURADOOR, the word DURADOOR is phonetically and deceptively similar to the
word DURODOOR of the plaintiffs. There exists registration of the word mark ... word mark used by the defendant is phonetically and
4
deceptively similar to that of the registered word marks, it would be appropriate to grant
