which also contains cefixime and the two products being phonetically and deceptively similar to the trade mark CEFI, present suit is filed.
3. By order ... using the trade mark ZIFI and/or any other trade mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade mark CEFI in respect of medicinal
view of the finding that the rival marks are not deceptively similar, question of confusion under Sections 11(a) does not arise.
(h) Respondent ... whether the mark sought to be registered was identical or deceptively similar to the petitioner's mark which was registered in respect of some
trade mark v;wj
or any other mark which may be deceptively similar thereto and from doing any other this as may lead to confusion ... trade mark AYUR or any other mark which may be deceptively similar thereto. The plaintiff has come to know in the 3rd week of June
other trade mark/label which may be identical with and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs registered trade mark.
2. Plaintiffs have been carrying ... mark "HIMALAYA BATISA No. 777" which was phonetically and deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's trade mark "HIMALAYAN BATISA
defendants' impugned trademark XENEX is visually as well as phonetically deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademark. Both the trademarks begin with the word ... ultimate test is whether the trademark used by the defendant is deceptively similar. The resemblance is this regard can be phonetically, visual
documents filed by the plaintiff. The trade mark GPI is deceptively similar to the trade mark GP. Hence, the defendant is guilty of infringement ... used by the defendant in respect to the same goods is deceptively similar to that of the trade mark GP of the plaintiff
cherish they are structurally and visually similar as well as aurally similar and easily give rise to deception and confusion. It would be highly improbable ... similarity in the phonetics of these two words. This phonetic similarity taken in conjunction with the fact that there is also a similarity
objection certificate that no trade mark identical with or deceptively similar to the artilstic work of the appellants has been registered under the Merchandise Marks ... that respondents No. 1 and 2 are using identical and/or deceptively similar mark "Ramayan" on their products and called upon the respondents
name 'Gaitonde' and therefore the usage can only be deceptively similar but not the same trade name or brand name; and that ... benefit of SSIU was extended to a brand name which is deceptively similar but not the same trade name or brand name. They also pleaded
Plaintiff that the trade mark of the Defendant RODINE-58 is deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of the Plaintiff namely ROTODINE and, therefore ... Rotodine. The trade mark Rodine being used by the Defendants is deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of the Plaintiff and, therefore, the Plaintiff
