such device to have visual similarity with picture of rising sun, there is no similarity much less deceptive similarity by the use of word ... deception or confusion and not actual deception or confusion in the minds of the buyers. Nor does, the definition of deceptively similar or likely
injunction. He submitted that the mark of the defendant is 'deceptively similar' as defined in Section 2(1)(d) of the Trade ... similar medicine on a previous occasion with a similar name."
According to the Hon'ble Supreme Court for deciding the question of deceptive
under which the appellant-defendant is doing business is so deceptively similar to the name of the respondent-plaintiff "Cibatul Limited" that ... plaintiff-Company that the name "Simatul" is deceptively similar to the name of the plaintiff Company "Cibatul" and it was calculated
deceptively same to the existing registered trade mark of the respondent.
(i) AIR 1963 SC 449 - "LAKSHMANDHARA" and "AMRITDHARA" deceptively similar ... deceptively similar.
(vii) AIR 1989 DEL. 44 - "CALMPOSE" phonetically and visually similar
and likely to cause confusion and deceptively similar
sold by the respondent herein contains a mark which is deceptively similar or identical with the mark "SPARDAC", a product of the appellant ... likelihood of confusion or deception since the word 'ULCI' and 'CIBAN' were not identical or deceptively similar. It was also found
VICAS' or any other trade mark which might be deceptively similar to trade mark 'VICKS' of the plaintiffs.
2, The facts giving ... drops under mark 'VICAS' and the said mark is deceptively similar to the mark of the plaintiffs' trade mark 'VICKS
RANGILI and/or any other label which is identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' RANGOLI Agarbatti (Essence stick) label. Defendants are apparently ... defendants is structurally and phonetically similar, apparent, eye-catching and predominant and carrying similarity of idea and deceptively similar with the registered trade mark
under the above said trade mark which is identical and deceptively similar to the trade mark label of plaintiff, causes confusion in the minds ... defendants respondents "TIN EKKA" is also identical and deceptively similar in style, manner, lay-out, get-up, colour scheme and placement of various
chance of future loss by virtue of the use of such
deceptively similar trade name or device and therefore, plaintiffs have
prima facie case ... 2021 CAV JUDGMENT
name of both the parties are not deceptively similar and distinctly
different i.e. WAGH BAKRI AND VIMAL. Looking to the above
Mahindra", use of the said name or any other deceptively similar word/s by any other person or entity as a part ... confusion or deception in the mind of purchasing public. It is denied that the name/word used by the defendant is deceptively similar
