from them arbitrarily. Though that decision is
not amenable to judicial review, the court can examine the
decision-making process and interfere ... making of legal point.
23. The Petitioner has not been able to make out a case of interference in
the decision making process, and, therefore
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
adopted by the decision-making
authority is mala fide, intended to favor someone, arbitrary or irrational.In
case the decision-making process is just, fair ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse ... process adopted or decision made by the authority
is not mala fide and not intended to favour someone; if
the process adopted or decision made
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-college submits
that the entire decision-making process by the NCISM, MARB and
the Union of India is illegal ... parties have also
argued on the procedure followed in the decision making process,
therefore, those aspects also require consideration by this court.
59. Having perused
condition to arriving at such a decision, have, not been met, the
decision making process and decision is in itself procedurally
defective. Procedural Defect ... powers under Article 226 , will not review a decision but
merely the decision-making process.
49.What section 10 requires is an assessment
Rahee Infratech Limited vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited & ... on 24 February, 2023
Author
