brought to the notice of the Selection Committee, and thus, the
decision-making process was itself flawed and based on irrelevant
considerations ... quasi-judicial
setting - to provide reasons for its decision. Nevertheless, the
decision-making process should be fair and reasonable, and ensure
that promotions are made
decision-maker has not understood the law
correctly that regulates his decision-making power or when it is
found that the decision of the decision ... examine the validity of the
decision but this Court can examine only the correctness of
the decision-making process.
XXX XXX XXX
16. It could
that of tender process is not of the decision but with
the decision making process. Mr. Tripathi mainly highlighted the
Wednesbury principles wherein ... examining
the decision making process and not the decision itself. The said
decision making process can be interfered with only exceptional cases
where the same
from them arbitrarily. Though that decision is
not amenable to judicial review, the court can examine the
decision-making process and interfere ... making of legal point.
23. The Petitioner has not been able to make out a case of interference in
the decision making process, and, therefore
merits of the
decision in support of which the application for judicial review is
made, but the decision- making process itself. Unless that
restriction ... rather than the merit of the decision itself. The
court observed that while scrutinizing the decision making process,
"it becomes inevitable to also appreciate
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
decision is one which no responsible
authority acting reasonably and in accordance with
law could have reached. In other words, the decision-
making process ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
adopted by the decision-making
authority is mala fide, intended to favor someone, arbitrary or irrational.In
case the decision-making process is just, fair ... that a decision if challenged (the
decision having been arrived at through a valid
process), the constitutional courts can interfere if the
decision is perverse
adopted by the decision-making
authority is mala fide, intended to favor someone, arbitrary or irrational.In
case the decision-making process is just, fair ... that a decision if challenged (the decision having been
arrived at through a valid process), the constitutional
courts can interfere if the decision is perverse
