protected workman", or
not ?
5) Whether the workman becomes
disentitled to claim the special status as a
"protected workman" after criminal charges ... grant the status of protected
workman. If the workman fulfils the following conditions,
firstly, that he is a workman in the establishment, secondly
Union for declaring five workmen, including respondent no.3, as `protected workmen' was allowed and they were declared as `protected workmen ... protected workman,' the said respondent was a protected workman and as such he was required to be protected and was entitled
time when
services of respondents workmen were terminated on 13.6.1989, at that
occasion respondents workmen were declared as protected workmen ... pending
before Industrial Tribunal, Baroda. According to workmen, they are
concerned workmen and also protected workmen declared by authority.
Therefore, during pendency of such dispute
complainant herein being "protected workman". The
workman had also asserted that he had become a protected workman
due to non response ... management and against the workman to the
effect that workman was not a "protected workmen" at the time when
he was dismissed
been elected as an office bearer, he was declared a
protected workman under Rule 61 of the ID Central Rules for various years
which fact ... dated 27th September, 2005 the Respondent No.2 was again declared a
protected workman which order was to relate back to 1st April
protected workmen‟,
whether the workmen so mentioned in the communication can be deemed to
be „protected workmen‟ or acquire the status of „protected workmen‟ only ... ensure that
the status of „protected workmen‟ is being sought for by genuine persons
and the shield of „protected workmen‟ is not sought
prescribes time for filing application for recognition of a workman as a "protected workman" is a Mandatory or is a directory ... petitioner failed to submit the list of workmen for being declared "protected workmen" within the time prescribed i.e. before
constitution of Hindustan Times
Employees Union, Delhi; that he was declared as protected workman
as per Section ... malafide, wrong, illegal, unfair and unjustified; that the workman was
declared a protected workman by the ALC, New Delhi vide order
dated 03.11.2005 being
Workman" on the date of transfer but he was declared as "Protected Workman" by the Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central) on 12.8.2022. Hence ... Workman", but in this case, petitioner no.2 was declared as "Protected Workman" by Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) vide order dated
result in
retrenchment of the workman also.
9. On the issue whether the workman was a protected
workman, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner ... office bearers of the union who they wanted
to be declared as protected workmen and that list had also been
C.W.P. No.4451
