Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 726 (1.02 seconds)

N D Dharam Sagar vs M/O Railways on 21 September, 2021

applicant during the vigilance check, whereas the Inspector who conducted the decoy check was examined with reference to the same document. Hence, RUD-3 cannot ... isolated one. 4. Respondents in their reply statement state that decoy check with independent witnesses was conducted on 6.7.2009, in regard to the allegation that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Sudhakar Rao vs M/O Railways on 11 January, 2018

decoy was also placed under suspension for his misconduct on duty. Therefore, such persons are unfit to be selected as decoy check and as witness ... Railway Vigilance Manual. As the decoy passenger has participated in more than one decoy check, he is unfit to act as witness in the present
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anuj B Pathak vs M/O Railways on 6 February, 2026

respect of any transaction with the decoy passenger. It is only because of the failure of the decoy check with the decoy passenger that ... witness the transaction of the decoy passenger, was himself made to purchase a ticket after the decoy check failed, which is not permissible. Further there
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lalit Kumar Tripathi vs Union Of India on 14 March, 2023

Apart from the CBI, the Railway Vigilance department also carries out decoy checks. These checks require careful planning, selection, execution and documentation for success ... signed by all present. 518.11 It is essential that a successful decoy check should be followed to its logical conclusion, namely - the issue
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next