been
amended and the licensees in occupation, were declared as deemed tenants,
by virtue of Section 15A of the said Act. The appellant has been ... tenants of the premises which are not covered under the
Public Premises Act are concerned, those tenants who were deemed tenants
under the Bombay Rent
contending that the respondent
was neither a tenant, nor a sub-tenant, nor a deemed
tenant. The Court of Small Causes by interim order dated ... tenants and
other persons as have derived
(i) (i) who is a tenant, or title under a tenant (before
(ii) (ii) who is a deemed
been
amended and the licensees in occupation, were declared as deemed tenants,
by virtue of Section 15A of the said Act. The appellant has been ... tenants of the premises which are not covered under the
Public Premises Act are concerned, those tenants who were deemed tenants
under the Bombay Rent
petitioner (as is so in the instant case) is a deemed tenant and is
protected under a tenancy law, he cannot be evicted. Section ... occupation". Whatever rights such prior
tenants, members of their families or heirs of such tenants or deemed tenants
or all of those who fall
petitioner (as
is so in the instant case) is a deemed tenant and is protected under a tenancy
law, he cannot be evicted. Section ... occupation". Whatever rights such prior
tenants, members of their families or heirs of such tenants or deemed tenants
or all of those who fall
Interseas Corporation became the
tenant of the Life Insurance Corporation and the appellant
company became the sub-tenant by operation of law in
relation ... case
of the appellant company that it has become a deemed tenant
under the respondent Life Insurance Corporation because of
the Bombay Rents Hotel
Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 and Punjab
Tenants (Security of Tenure) Act, 1950, they are the tenants under those
Acts and can be evicted only ... prior tenants, members of their families or heirs of
LPA No.479/2013 and connected matters Page 16 of 38
such tenants or deemed tenants
retirement.
Respondent No. 3 cannot be treated as deemed tenant."
9. He argued that this principle of law has been reiterated by the
Supreme
find is that the appellant had the
status of a deemed tenant under the Bombay Rent Act, 1947 prior to
the premises concerned "belonging ... present case, the appellant's status as a deemed tenant
was accepted under the State enactment, and therefore he could not
be said
suit had sought declaration to the fact that the
plaintiff was a tenant till the time he had vacated the premises and
indeed ... occupation". Whatever rights such prior tenants,
members of their families or heirs of such tenants or
deemed tenants or all of those who fall
