October, 2015
Author: Hemant Gupta
Bench: Hemant Gupta , Deepak Sibal
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
AT CHANDIGARH
LPA No.1369 of 2015
Date ... JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for the petitioners.
1. To be referred to the reporters
suit before the civil Court is not maintainable.
ARGUMENTS
5. Shri Deepak Sibal, learned counsel for the appellant, argued that the Board cannot create Dispute
Rana, Advocate;
Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocate; Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate;
Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate; Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate;
Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate; Mr. Sumeet
another
Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana ...Respondent
Present: Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate,
for the appellants.
CEA No.28 of 2012
Dev Raj Gupta ...Appellant ... objections raised in paras 17(ii) and 17(v)."
Mr. Deepak Sibal, learned counsel representing the appellant
- Mill, has vehemently argued that the Tribunal
suit before the Civil Court is not maintainable.
ARGUMENTS
5. Shri. Deepak Sibal, learned counsel for the appellant, argued that the Board cannot create Dispute
Sandeep Moudgil, D.A.G., Punjab
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent
Learned counsel for the petitioners also relied upon Deepak
Sibal v. Panjab University and another , AIR 1989 Supreme Court 903, to
contend that in considering
Singh, Advocate
for respondent No.14.
Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate
for respondent No. 18.
Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate
for respondent No.19.
Mr. Ashok Jindal
GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present: Mr. Deepak Sibal, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Amit Jhanji, Advocate for the petitioner.
*******
HEMANT GUPTA
JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent ... Union of India and others .
(HEMANT GUPTA)
JUDGE
OCTOBER 30, 2015 (DEEPAK SIBAL)
'D. Gulati' JUDGE
GULATI DIWAKER
2015.11.04 11:28
I attest
