Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 263 (4.59 seconds)

Npr Finance Ltd. vs . Vinod Kumar on 7 March, 2012

take possession of the vehicle. It was further stated that the complainant company was not aware that the vehicle was defected. It was further stated ... vehicle loan and all documents with respect to the same have been placed on record and the factum of vehicle being defective have no nexus
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ram Parkash on 30 August, 2012

defective. He further deposed that he did not take any photographs of the defective number plate. He denied the suggestion that the offending vehicle ... fall on the route of the offending vehicle. Also, the number plate of the offending vehicle was defective. Vehicle No. DL2W 2015 State
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C.B.I. vs . 1) Ps Sehrawat on 27 August, 2012

Brijpal Singh, produced the record pertaining to vehicle No. DBP 1648. The fitness certificate of this vehicle shows to have been issued at 5:15pm ... driver again brought to him after rectifying the defect. The vehicle was inspected by him (A4) and A2 Daulat Ram during the period 3:45pm
Delhi District Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Kallu, on 27 November, 2012

relative's house near Badayun. Their vehicle developed some defect and therefore they were getting the same repaired near the bus stand. Ganesh Soni ... village of sister of accused towards Badayun, on the way their vehicle developed defect. He noticed accused Kallu going with his son Rahul. He immediately
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . (1) Rajesh on 3 July, 2012

about the problem with the vehicle and only asked to go to the spot and to rectify the defect. According to him, he reached ... stopped by the police from examining the vehicle or from rectify the defect. The witness has denied the suggestion that
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Pritam on 16 July, 2012

that even after applying them, the vehicle could not be stopped in time. A pedestrian or a vehicle going ahead of another cannot contemplate that ... cannot be said if it was due to any mechanical defect in the vehicle. In view of the above discussions and judgments relied upon
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next